Change any parameter and every number recalculates instantly, for both options. The two presets load the published study baseline ($8 adult / $6 student, $5 dome add-on) and the revised pricing proposal of 8 August 2026 ($14/$8 museum, $12/$10 planetarium, $22/$16/$20 combos) now circulating with the group. Nothing is saved or sent anywhere; this page is a sandbox.
Blue values are yours to change. Presets overwrite everything.
| Visits (after demand response) | – |
| Admissions revenue | – |
| Retail net | – |
| Programs, memberships, rentals | – |
| Total earned | – |
| Operating expense | – |
| Support gap | – |
| Earned coverage | – |
| Gap vs committed support | – |
| Break-even attendance at these prices | – |
| Visits (after demand response) | – |
| Admissions revenue | – |
| Planetarium / combo increment | – |
| Retail net | – |
| Programs, memberships, rentals | – |
| Total earned | – |
| Operating expense | – |
| Support gap | – |
| Earned coverage | – |
| Gap vs committed support | – |
| Section | Topic | What it answers |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Executive finding and decision | Go / no-go posture, both options |
| 02 | Study scope, evidence and limitations | What this study is, and is not |
| 03 | The Neosho moment: collection, heritage, timing | Why 2026 changed the case |
| 04 | Market and audience feasibility | Who is actually reachable |
| 05 | Defensible attendance forecast | The number the board can plan on |
| 06 | Museum concept and exhibit program | What 17,000 net sf should contain |
| 07 | Space, site and visitor-flow feasibility | Gross vs net, buses, downtown fit |
| 08 | Planetarium option: uniqueness, sizing, gates | Whether and when to build the dome |
| 09 | Collections, governance and professional standards | Public-trust readiness |
| 10 | Education, university and community partnerships | The school engine |
| 11 | Repeat visitation and content renewal | Why year 3 beats year 1 |
| 12 | Marketing, tourism and highway signage | Signage rules, Branson, Route 66 |
| 13 | Staffing, accessibility and operational readiness | The team the promise requires |
| 14 | Risk register and mitigation | What kills projects like this |
| 15 | Recommendation, gates and validation workplan | The next 16 weeks |
| 16 | Assumptions and source register | Every number's provenance |
This study rests on current, independently verified evidence: (1) the announced relocation of the Space Museum & Grissom Center and its collection from Bonne Terre to Neosho (May 2026), which fundamentally changes the collection-readiness picture; (2) Census Bureau Vintage 2025 county estimates, the 21-county catchment now counts 1,527,138 residents; (3) ACS-based K-12 counts roughly two-thirds larger than the sponsor's original premise; (4) a corrected, defensible Northwest Arkansas growth claim; (5) an as-built planetarium cost comparable (University of Alaska Fairbanks, opened April 2026) at essentially the proposed spec; (6) verified MoDOT signage eligibility rules and 2025 traffic counts; (7) the 2026 Route 66 centennial marketing window; and (8) sector headwinds from the AAM's November 2025 national survey, which argue for the conservative posture this study takes.
Read the executive finding first, then test the assumptions most likely to change the decision: school commitments, the collection relocation agreement's final terms, gross-versus-net building area, capital funding, and recurring operating support. The companion Business Feasibility Study carries the financial model; the two documents share one evidence base and one set of planning ranges.
Decision. The museum concept merits advancement into a formal validation and concept-design phase. The May 2026 announcement that the Space Museum & Grissom Center will relocate from Bonne Terre to Neosho with a collection publicly valued at roughly $40 million converts the study's largest open risk, collection readiness, into a negotiable, documentable asset [S9, S10]. What the concept still does not merit is an unconditional construction commitment. The remaining uncertainties, final relocation terms, school commitments, site condition, building-area definition, capital support and recurring subsidy, are decision-critical rather than cosmetic.
The recommended planning posture is unchanged and now better evidenced: a museum-first program with a planetarium-ready site plan. Construct the planetarium at opening only when its incremental capital is fully funded without operating debt, three years of incremental operating support are committed, school demand is evidenced in signed letters of intent, and the dome does not reduce the 16,000–18,000 net-square-foot exhibit program.
| Option | Museum finding | Attendance finding | Decision posture |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Museum only | Strongest institutional fit at lowest complexity; collection relocation supplies authentic artifacts a startup could never assemble | 17,800 low / 29,000 base / 44,000 high | Conditional go to validation |
| B. Museum + planetarium | Stronger differentiation and program renewal, the only public dome within ~60 miles, at higher technical and operating risk | 27,000 low / 41,000 base / 59,000 high | Gated go or Phase 2 |
Three things. First, the collection: Neosho no longer has to invent a museum; it has to re-house a real one, founded in 1999 by Earl Mullins, with Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab and shuttle artifacts and an advisory board that includes Lowell Grissom [S9–S12]. Second, the market: Vintage 2025 estimates confirm a growing 1.53-million-person catchment anchored by the 9th-fastest-growing metro in the United States [S1, S5]. Third, the caution: the AAM's November 2025 national survey found 55% of U.S. museums still below 2019 attendance and a third reporting cancelled government grants, the strongest argument yet for the conservative base case and gated planetarium this study recommends [S16].
This is a desktop feasibility study using sponsor inputs and current public evidence, intentionally decision-grade rather than bank-grade. A bankable study still requires a drive-time GIS model, household willingness-to-pay research, executed school commitments, a collection audit and relocation agreement, site/MEP/structural due diligence, schematic design, and independent cost estimates. Section 15 prices that validation phase; the companion Business Feasibility Study carries the full financial model.
The study separates museum feasibility from business feasibility. This report asks whether the institution can credibly serve audiences, care for collections, deliver education, operate the proposed space, and remain fresh enough to earn repeat visits. The companion business study tests capital, operating economics, price, revenue, fundraising and financial risk. Both evaluate the same two options independently.
| Claim in circulation | What the evidence supports |
|---|---|
| "Northwest Arkansas will double in 12–15 years" | NWA has roughly doubled since 2000 and is projected to grow another +74% by 2050 (587,750 → 1,024,464 for Benton + Washington counties, NWARPC February 2026 table). Doubling in 12–15 years would require ~5% annual growth; the actual rate is ~2.4% [S4, S5] |
| "About 100,000 public and 25,000 home-school students" | Conservative. ACS 2024 counts ~208,000 public and ~30,000 private school-age students in the 21-county ring; homeschoolers add an estimated 15,000–17,500 more (Arkansas's registry alone counts 32,767 statewide, led by Benton County) [S3, S6–S8] |
| "Bonne Terre draws ~3,000 visitors a year" | Unverifiable but plausible: the museum publishes no count, and its FY2023 revenue of $68,219 is consistent with a micro-scale operation open three public days a week at $15 adult / $10 student admission [S12, S13] |
| "16,000–18,000 square feet of exhibit space" | Must be resolved as net exhibit area vs gross building area before concept design, the difference is roughly a 24,650 versus 17,000 gross-square-foot building (Section 7) |
The forecast should be updated whenever a decision-critical fact changes, above all when the relocation agreement is executed and its terms (ownership, loan structure, conditions, naming) become documentable. The companion workbook makes every attendance, yield, operating and capital assumption visible rather than burying a single-point prediction.
Feasibility studies usually ask whether a community can build an institution from nothing. Neosho's question is different and better: can it successfully re-house and scale an existing museum whose collection took 25 years to assemble? Three converging facts define the moment.
On 29 May 2026 the Newton County Tourism Council announced that the Space Museum & Grissom Center, founded in 1999 by Earl Mullins in Bonne Terre, Missouri, has agreed to relocate to Neosho, bringing a collection publicly described at roughly $40 million: Gus Grissom's Mercury training suit, flown Gemini 3 material, John Young's Gemini suit, Apollo, Skylab and shuttle artifacts, a VR spacewalk and a shuttle launch simulator. The museum's advisory board includes Lowell Grissom, Gus Grissom's brother; its exhibits were built with help from ex-McDonnell Aircraft "Mercury 6" engineers. Sites near the downtown square are under negotiation, on a one-to-two-year timeline. Neosho prevailed over a competing St. Charles option [S9–S12]. Local principals are Steve Roark, president of the Newton County Tourism Council, and board member Pete Hall [S9].
Neosho is not borrowing a space story. From 1956 to 1968, Rocketdyne's Neosho plant built and tested rocket engines for Cold War and Apollo-era programs, the town was known as "Spacetown, U.S.A." A space museum here is heritage interpretation, not theming, and that authenticity matters to funders (NASA's informal-education programs, IMLS narrative criteria) and to press coverage alike [S11]. It also gives the museum a permanent local gallery no other institution can copy: the people of the Ozarks who built the engines that went to the Moon.
The relocation converts this study's hardest gate from "assemble a credible collection" to "execute a sound agreement." Validation must now prioritize: legal title and loan terms for the collection; a condition, insurance and transport plan (artifact-grade logistics from Bonne Terre); the operating relationship with the founding organization and Mr. Mullins; and continuity of the Grissom family association, one of the museum's most marketable assets.
At the announcement's publication, the museum itself had not yet formally confirmed the agreement, no site was final, and the $40M valuation is repeated from sponsors rather than independently appraised. Nothing in this study's base case depends on the valuation being exact; everything in the validation plan depends on the agreement being executed and documented [S9].
A transparent 21-county approximation of the proposed 70–75-mile service area contains 1,527,138 residents in the Census Bureau's Vintage 2025 estimates, up 7.3% since 2020. A more conservative 19-county cut (dropping the outermost Labette KS and Mayes OK) still counts 1,467,037. Either figure independently validates the sponsor's "about 1.5 million" premise, excluding Tulsa County entirely [S1]. Growth is strikingly bimodal: the Arkansas counties grew +3.5% to +17.0% in five years while the Kansas counties were flat to declining, the market's center of gravity is moving toward Neosho's south [S1].
| Ring | Population 2025 | Change 2020→25 | Anchor counties |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core ~30 minutes (Newton, Jasper, McDonald, Ottawa OK, Cherokee KS) | 263,226 | +3.5% | Joplin MSA 208,796; Neosho city 14,078 (+10.8%) |
| 21-county / 70–75-mile ring | 1,527,138 | +7.3% | Greene MO 309,286 · Benton AR 332,554 · Washington AR 271,213 |
| Conservative 19-county cut | 1,467,037 | +7.5% | Drops Labette KS, Mayes OK |
The NWA metro (Benton, Washington, Madison counties) reached 622,177 residents in July 2025, adding ~40 people per day and ranking as the 9th-fastest-growing metro in the nation; its first top-10 finish this decade [S1, S5]. The Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission's February 2026 tables project Benton + Washington counties growing from 587,750 (2024) to 1,024,464 by 2050 (+74%), with Benton County alone up 88% [S4]. The defensible formulation for board and funder documents: "Northwest Arkansas has doubled since 2000 and is projected to approach one million people by 2050." Bentonville sits 46 road miles from Neosho's square, closer than Springfield, and the corridor between them is the fastest-appreciating audience this museum will ever have [S1].
Population is a denominator, not a forecast. The base case captures 1.9% of the 21-county ring as annual visits (2.7% with the planetarium), plausible rates that still require execution on schools, families and tourism, tested segment by segment in Section 5.
The 21-county ring contains an estimated 208,420 public-school students and 30,256 private-school students ages 5–17 (ACS 2024 five-year data), roughly two-thirds more than the sponsor's original 125,000-student premise [S3]. Homeschooling adds a further estimated 15,000–17,500: Missouri does not register homeschoolers, but Saint Louis University's PRiME Center estimates ~61,000 statewide (6.1%+ of school-age population, doubled since 2019); Arkansas's registry counts 32,767 statewide with Benton County first in the state at 4,161; Johns Hopkins estimates ~7.9% of Oklahoma and ~5.4% of Kansas K-12 students are homeschooled [S6–S8]. The proposed $6 school ticket, pre-booked weekday home-school cohorts and bus-distance geography line up squarely against this base.
| Institution | Fall 2025 enrollment | Note |
|---|---|---|
| University of Arkansas, Fayetteville | 34,175 | Record, fifth straight year of growth |
| Missouri State University, Springfield | 25,238 | Record; 7,778 dual-enrollment students |
| Ozarks Technical CC, Springfield | 10,779 | Record; feeds from 400+ high schools |
| NorthWest Arkansas CC, Bentonville | ~9,000 | Strong dual-credit growth |
| Pittsburg State University | 5,803 | Third straight year of growth; Kelce Planetarium partner candidate |
| Crowder College, Neosho | 4,337 | +9.6%, the museum's natural academic partner, in town |
| Missouri Southern State U., Joplin | ~4,150 | +2% YoY; headcount from IPEDS 2024 |
| Evangel · JBU · Drury · NEO A&M | 9,512 | 2,741 · 2,536 · 2,273 · 1,962 |
| Corridor total | ~103,000 | Treat as partnership capacity, not a capture denominator |
Sources: Fall 2025 institutional enrollment releases, compiled [S2]. The near-term college opportunity is programmatic, guest lectures, astronomy nights, engineering showcases, internships, teacher preparation, co-produced exhibits, Crowder dual-credit tie-ins, with $6 college admission as the on-ramp.
The proposed museum sits between large attractions in Springfield, Northwest Arkansas and Tulsa. These institutions confirm regional appetite for interactive learning; none is a direct comparable, and two of the closest analogues carry cautionary lessons.
| Institution | Distance | Scale | Adult price | Current evidence (2025–26) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Space Museum & Grissom Center, Bonne Terre MO | relocating | ~5,000 sf Grissom Ctr + orig. bldg | $15 / $10 student | 3 public days/week; FY2023 revenue $68,219, the collection outgrew its host town [S12, S13] |
| Discovery Center of Springfield | 77 mi | 60,000 sf | $17 / $12 child | FY2023 revenue $2.63M; no planetarium [S13, S24] |
| Scott Family Amazeum, Bentonville | 46 mi | 52,000 sf | $17 all ages | 245,000+ guests latest year; $25M expansion campaign launched Jan 2025 [S17] |
| Tulsa Air & Space Museum + Planetarium | 95 mi | 19,000 sf exhibits | $11; $20 combo | Nearly closed in 2023 at Neosho's proposed scale; recovered to $1.28M revenue FY2023; 30,000+ students/yr [S13, S21] |
| Cosmosphere, Hutchinson KS | 280 mi | 105,000 sf | $18.25; $32.50 pass | Smithsonian affiliate; $5.4M revenue FY2023; dome + planetarium priced as add-ons [S13, S22] |
| Stafford Air & Space, Weatherford OK | 250 mi | 63,000→75,000 sf | $14 / $8 student | Smithsonian affiliate; expansion completing spring 2026; small-town (pop. ~12k) space museum that works [S23] |
| Exploration Place, Wichita | 200 mi | 100,000 sf | $21 | Record 409,975 visitors FY2023-24; dome theater included in admission [S18] |
| George Washington Carver Nat'l Monument, Diamond MO | 5 mi | NPS site | Free | 31,062 visitors in 2025 (39,081 in 2024; 49,553 in 2019), the local reality check [S19] |
| Crystal Bridges, Bentonville | 46 mi | +114,000 sf June 2026 | Free (endowed) | Record ~785,000 (2023); expansion lifts the whole corridor's cultural tourism [S25] |
Bonne Terre is a floor, not a multiplier. Its ~3,000 sponsor-reported annual visitors reflect three open days, a micro budget and a town of 7,000. Neosho's six-day schedule, 1.53M catchment and $8 price change every one of those variables, which is precisely why this study builds attendance from segments instead of scaling Bonne Terre. Tulsa is the scale warning. The nearest air/space museum nearly failed in 2023 at 19,000 exhibit square feet, Neosho's proposed size, before recovering; durable operating support, not square footage, made the difference. Stafford is the small-town proof. A Smithsonian-affiliated space museum thrives in an Oklahoma town smaller than Neosho, on the strength of collection authenticity, interstate access and relentless expansion [S13, S21, S23].
Sector context reinforces conservatism: ASTC's 2024 respondent medians, 167,500 onsite visits, $14–15 adult admission, 30,000 sf of interior exhibit space, describe institutions larger and longer-established than this project; and the AAM's November 2025 national survey found 55% of museums below 2019 attendance, 34% with cancelled government grants, and the sector's worst financial outlook since the pandemic [S15, S16]. The forecast that follows deliberately sits far below sector medians.
The forecast is a segment build-up, not a population-percentage shortcut. Five mutually exclusive audience segments are estimated separately, then tested against total catchment capture, building scale, pricing, program capacity and the regional comparables of Section 4. The base museum-only case captures 1.9% of the 21-county population as annual visits; the planetarium case captures 2.7%. Those rates are plausible but still require execution, above all on schools.
| Audience segment | Museum low | Museum base | Museum high | Dome low | Dome base | Dome high |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-12 field trips | 5,000 | 8,500 | 13,000 | 7,000 | 11,000 | 16,000 |
| College / scout / youth | 1,000 | 1,800 | 3,000 | 2,000 | 3,000 | 5,000 |
| Independent residents | 8,000 | 12,500 | 18,000 | 11,000 | 16,000 | 22,000 |
| Destination / tourist / festivals | 3,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 | 12,000 |
| Private events / outreach-linked | 800 | 1,200 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 3,000 | 4,000 |
| TOTAL | 17,800 | 29,000 | 44,000 | 27,000 | 41,000 | 59,000 |
Segment basis: sponsor inputs [S45]; Census S1–S3; comparables S17–S23; author model. K-12 base = 4.1% of the 21-county public-school population (5.3% in the dome case), rates that must be pre-sold through district letters of intent, not assumed.
| Year | Museum-only base | Museum + planetarium base | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opening year | 31,900 | 45,100 | 10% opening curiosity premium; Route 66 centennial spillover if opening lands in the window |
| Year 2 | 29,000 | 41,000 | Novelty normalizes; stabilized base |
| Year 3 | 29,870 | 43,050 | Partnership and program maturation |
| Year 4 | 30,885 | 45,100 | Requires disciplined refresh and retention |
| Year 5 | 31,900 | 47,150 | Planetarium case assumes stronger repeat cadence |
Do not use 29,000 or 41,000 as a promise. Use them as base operating scenarios. Board decisions should survive the low cases of 17,800 and 27,000 visits. The high cases should not support debt or fixed staffing until two full operating years establish demand. And the AAM's 2025 finding, a majority of U.S. museums still below 2019 attendance, is a sector-wide caution against assuming the ramp climbs on its own [S16].
Neosho's six-day schedule removes the single largest access barrier in the Bonne Terre model, whose three public days cap school and family availability. But doubling open days does not double demand; it doubles capacity to say yes, to a Tuesday school booking, a Saturday family, a Thursday home-school cohort. The forecast monetizes the schedule through the segment mix, not through a blanket multiplier. Six days also triggers real staffing consequences, priced in the companion study, and comfortably clears the IMLS eligibility threshold of 120 public days per year [S40].
Square footage does not create attendance; it creates dwell time, capacity and content credibility. At 17,000 net square feet the museum can hold a two-to-three-hour visit, the threshold at which a 60–90-minute drive becomes rational for a family, and at which teachers can justify a full field-trip day. It can absorb two simultaneous school groups plus independent visitors without crowding failure. And it is large enough to devote 3,000 square feet to rotation, the repeat-visit engine of Section 11, without cannibalizing the core galleries. ASTC's 2024 median of 30,000 interior square feet confirms Neosho would open below sector median, which is the correct side of the line for a first building: the forecast, not the architecture, should carry the ambition [S15].
A strong museum is not a warehouse of space artifacts. It is a repeatable learning system combining authentic objects, human stories, live interpretation, hands-on investigation and a rotating window onto current missions. The relocating collection supplies what money can barely buy, flown and training hardware with provenance, and the concept should answer one memorable question: how do people from this region understand, build, navigate and participate in humanity's movement into space?
| Exhibit zone | Net sf | Core visitor promise | Renewal cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch, flight and the space race | 6,000 | The Grissom Mercury suit, Gemini 3 flown material, John Young's Gemini suit, iconic objects, propulsion, risk and human stories | Stable core; annual artifact/story swaps from the relocated collection |
| Spacetown, U.S.A., Rocketdyne in Neosho | 1,500 | The Ozarks workers who built Apollo-era engines, 1956–68; oral histories, plant artifacts, regional aerospace today | University/community co-curation; ties to Camp Crowder heritage |
| Living and working in space | 3,000 | Microgravity, life support, medicine, communications; VR spacewalk and shuttle simulator from the collection | Program and media refresh twice yearly |
| Moon-to-Mars design lab | 2,500 | Hands-on engineering and mission decisions keyed to Artemis-era missions | Challenges rotate quarterly |
| Rotating special exhibition | 3,000 | A new reason to return | One major + two light changes annually |
| Visible collections / flexible interactive | 1,000 | Behind-the-scenes care and close looking | Object rotations every 3–6 months |
| TOTAL NET EXHIBIT | 17,000 | Balanced artifact + interactive experience | At least 20% visibly renewed each year |
The 3,000-square-foot rotating zone is the most important repeat-visitation investment in the museum-only option: it prevents the permanent collection from carrying the full burden of novelty, and it creates sponsor inventory, school rebooking reasons and media moments. The Spacetown gallery is the concept's signature move: it is the one gallery no competitor can replicate, the natural home for local oral history partnerships with Crowder College and the Newton County Historical Society, and the strongest possible answer to a funder's "why Neosho?" question [S11].
Design galleries around the documented collection, not around renderings. The relocation agreement's inventory, legal title, loan terms, condition, conservation needs, must precede schematic design, so the museum opens with the objects it advertises (Section 9).
The phrase "16,000–18,000 square feet of exhibit space" must be resolved before concept design. If it means net exhibit area, the total building is likely at least 24,000–28,000 gross square feet. If it means total gross building area, only about 10,000–12,000 square feet remain for exhibits after visitor services, education, collections, offices, restrooms, circulation, walls and mechanical systems, a different museum with a different forecast. This is the highest-consequence unresolved definition in the project.
| Program component | Planning sf | Feasibility note |
|---|---|---|
| Net exhibits | 17,000 | Sponsor midpoint; protects the educational and repeat program |
| Lobby / admissions / retail | 1,200 | Must absorb bus groups without blocking public flow |
| Classroom / party / multipurpose | 1,000 | Divisible or schedulable for two groups |
| Collections / prep / storage | 1,500 | Environmental, security and work zones, sized for the relocated collection's reserve, not just what is displayed |
| Staff / administration | 800 | Minimum professional support |
| Restrooms / circulation / MEP / walls | 3,150 | Tight allowance; validate architecturally |
| MUSEUM-ONLY GROSS | 24,650 | Concept-planning minimum |
| Planetarium addition | +3,900 | 60–70 seats, ~10–11 m dome, queue, egress and support (Section 8) |
Sites "near the town square" are under negotiation [S9]. Downtown delivers walkable pairing with Big Spring Park, the historic district (with potential historic tax-credit value), festival foot traffic, the Fall Festival alone brings ~18,000 people to the square each October, and civic visibility. It also concentrates the risks that kill adaptive-reuse museum budgets [S42]:
ASTC's 2024 U.S. respondent median was about 30,000 square feet of interior exhibit space, larger than the proposed museum. That comparison reinforces a sub-median attendance forecast and warns against treating square footage as a demand generator. Size enables content and dwell time; it does not create attendance by itself [S15].
A planetarium is more than a projection system. It is a scheduled theater, a curriculum platform, an evening venue and a technology lifecycle. Its strongest justification in Neosho is not additional square footage; it is the ability to change the museum's program rapidly without rebuilding exhibits, and a genuinely open competitive lane.
| Pros | Cons / exposure |
|---|---|
| Fast content renewal: live sky, current missions, seasonal astronomy, custom local programs | Incremental capital planning range of $4.5–$6.5M; UAF's as-built 2026 benchmark is $5.6M construction plus ~$0.5M systems for a 65-seat, 11 m dome [S26] |
| Clear differentiation from artifact-only museums and a strong school-group scheduling anchor | Specialist operators, show licensing, maintenance, calibration, acoustic and HVAC demands |
| Premium add-on, bundle, member benefit, after-hours rental and sponsor inventory | Technology lifecycle: projector systems refresh every 10–15 years at $250K–$500K (Bellevue $450K; Toledo $320K; Wyoming $250K) [S28] |
| Weatherproof capacity and precise control over program length and throughput | Fixed showtimes can create queues, missed starts and group-flow bottlenecks |
| University partnerships, live presenters, data visualization and public-science events | Sensory, mobility, hearing, captioning and motion-sickness accommodations must be designed in |
| A reason to return monthly rather than annually | Not all dome users are incremental museum visitors; attachment is not the same as new demand, and no published industry attachment-rate data exists to lean on [S30] |
The NWA Space and Science Center in Rogers, organized, funded enough to open an office in April 2026, and located in the region's richest county, intends to build exactly this kind of facility. Neosho's dome decision is therefore not only "can we afford it?" but "is the differentiation worth defending before someone else builds it 45 minutes south?" The gates below keep the decision honest either way [S33].
Recommended planning size. A 60–70-seat, ~10 m forward-facing full-dome theater is enough for one bus group plus chaperones while limiting capital and empty-seat optics. At 41,000 total base-case visits, a 70% attachment rate produces 28,700 dome users. At five shows per day across 300 days, average attendance is ~19 people per show, 27% of seat capacity, leaving school and event headroom without supporting a larger dome. Show licensing is a modest line: perpetual educational licenses run ~$7,000 per show at this seat tier, or ~$1,400 per year, a rotating library of six to ten shows costs $5K–$15K annually [S29]. A ~$30–50K portable dome, run as school outreach from year one, is the low-risk bridge that builds the booking network before the fixed theater opens [S26].
| Planetarium gate | Opening-day requirement |
|---|---|
| Capital | 100% of incremental capital identified; no operating debt assigned to the dome |
| Demand | School/group letters supporting at least 11,000 annual K-12 visits and tested family willingness to pay |
| Operating support | Three years of incremental operating commitments plus an annual technology reserve (~$35–50K against the 10–15-year refresh) |
| Scope | Additive ~3,900 sf or equivalent; does not displace 16–18k net exhibits |
| Procurement | At least three vendor/architect ROM estimates (Cosm/E&S, Sky-Skan, RSA Cosmos-class) including content licenses, support and replacement cycle |
| Programming | Twelve-month calendar, live-presenter capacity and accessibility plan before equipment selection |
Museum feasibility turns on what the institution will hold in public trust. The relocation changes the question from "can a collection be assembled?" to "can the transfer be executed to professional standards?" Before design, the sponsor and the relocating organization should complete a collection-by-collection inventory covering legal title, provenance, donor restrictions, NASA loan status (flown artifacts are frequently federal property on loan), condition, dimensions, insurance value, intellectual-property rights, hazardous materials, conservation needs, light and humidity limits, mounts, security and transport requirements.
| Core document / control | Why it is required before opening |
|---|---|
| Mission and institutional plan | Defines what the museum does, and what it declines |
| Relocation & collection agreement | Critical: ownership vs loan structure, term, insurance, transport, naming, the founding organization's ongoing role, and reversion terms if the project stalls |
| Scope of Collections | Controls acquisition boundaries and prevents unfunded accumulation |
| Collections Management Policy | Acquisition, loans, deaccession, access, care, ethics and authority |
| Emergency / disaster plan | People, collections, fire, water, power and continuity response |
| Code of ethics and conflicts policy | Donors, appraisals, collecting, sponsorship and board conduct |
| Security and environmental plan | Protects objects and strengthens lender/insurer confidence, a precondition of NASA and Smithsonian-affiliate loans |
| Interpretive and education plan | Connects mission, audiences, standards and measurable outcomes |
| Financial sustainability plan | Documents capital sources, reserves and recurring support |
AAM treats collections as held in public trust and expects documentation, care and public access; its Core Documents Verification (mission, ethics, strategic plan, disaster plan, collections policy) is the correct first credentialing target for a young institution, full accreditation requires years of operating history. The NPS Museum Handbook provides detailed operational guidance for environment, storage, fire, security, emergency planning and records. IMLS eligibility requires nonprofit or public status, professional staff, tangible objects, care of those objects, and public exhibition at least 120 days a year, sequencing that matters for the grant strategy in the companion study [S40].
Do not design galleries around promised artifacts until ownership, loan and transfer terms are documented. A compelling rendering built around unavailable objects is not feasibility; it is a future redesign cost. This warning now applies specifically to the relocation inventory: the ~$40M valuation is unappraised, and any NASA-owned items in the collection move on NASA's terms, not the museum's [S9].
The receiving entity should be a Missouri 501(c)(3) with a board spanning finance, museum practice, education, development, legal, facilities, marketing, technology and community representation, including continuity seats that honor the founding organization and the Grissom family association. Management needs explicit authority limits for contracts, discounts, acquisitions, loans, capital changes and restricted funds.
The education program should be sold as a repeatable service, not offered as passive access. Two targeted grade bands work when each has standards-aligned outcomes, teacher pre-work, a timed on-site experience and post-visit materials. Recommended initial bands are grades 6–8 and 10–12, with elementary and home-school modules added after operations stabilize. Planetarium-based instruction carries real research support, controlled studies show measurable gains for celestial-motion and spatial concepts when dome visits are integrated with classroom pre- and post-work, which belongs in every district pitch and grant narrative [S44].
| Program | Audience | Format | Demand evidence to obtain |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mission Control: systems and tradeoffs | Grades 6–8 | 90–120 min gallery + lab | District curriculum review and 15 pilot teachers |
| Design for Moon / Mars | Grades 10–12 | Half-day engineering challenge | STEM/CTE commitments and capstone partners |
| Spacetown oral-history lab | Grades 8–12 + college | Interview, archive and exhibit-build practicum around Rocketdyne veterans and families | Crowder College and historical-society MOUs |
| College Space Forum | College / graduate | Evening lectures, labs, data jams | Faculty memoranda and annual calendar |
| Home-school mission days | Mixed ages | Pre-booked weekday cohorts | Association interviews and price test, the four-state home-school base is ~15,000+ students, with Benton County the largest registered cluster in Arkansas [S6–S8] |
| Scout / youth badges | Organized youth | Weekend program + dome option | Council/leader package sales |
| Teacher institute | Educators | Summer professional development | University credit or district recognition |
The business plan should require signed letters of intent rather than enthusiasm. For the museum-only base case, obtain commitments or well-documented pipelines totaling at least 8,500 K-12 annual visits; for the planetarium case, the gate rises to at least 11,000. With ~208,000 public-school students in the ring, those targets represent 4.1% and 5.3% penetration, demanding but real, provided bus logistics (fuel underwriting is a proven sponsor product), district approvals and teacher champions are worked as a sales pipeline with rebooking windows each spring.
Crowder College, 4,337 students, +9.6% in Fall 2025, in Neosho itself, is the museum's structural partner: dual-credit courses using museum labs, work-study docents and technicians, aerospace/CTE program tie-ins, and a standing pipeline of local families. A formal Crowder MOU belongs in the validation phase, not after opening.
A space museum becomes stale quickly if it presents history as finished. Repeat visitation must be designed into the institution, budget and calendar. A planetarium makes refresh easier, but does not replace rotating exhibits, live interpretation and member programming.
| Retention KPI | Year-2 target | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| School rebooking | >55% | Reduces annual sales reset |
| Membership renewal | >60% | Tests household value beyond novelty |
| Known repeat households | >20% of household visits | Measures actual return rather than intent |
| Rotating-zone penetration | >70% | Confirms visitors notice the refresh investment |
| Planetarium load | 35–50% peak-season average | Balances experience, capacity and economics |
| Email-to-visit conversion | Campaign-specific baseline | Directly connects marketing to attendance |
The difference between the low case (17,800) and the base case (29,000) is not awareness; it is return. Independent residents are the largest single segment at 12,500 base visits, and residents only return to what changes. Every dollar of rotating-exhibit and program budget is an attendance dollar, and the first budget line to defend in a downturn.
Marketing should prioritize bookable demand over broad awareness: school and group sales, local family acquisition and retention deserve more weight than general billboards. Highway signage improves wayfinding and credibility; it should not be modeled as if every passing vehicle were a prospect. The companion business study carries budgets and channel costs; the feasibility findings are these:
| Program | Eligibility (7 CSR 10-17) | Cost / implication |
|---|---|---|
| Interstate logo signs (blue "Attraction" panels) | Museums qualify as cultural/educational sites; open ≥4 hrs/day, 5 days/week incl. one weekend day; ≥10 parking spaces; public restrooms; within 15 miles of the interchange | $1,000/year per direction at Neosho's I-49/US-60 interchange (its ~21,167 AADT sits in the sub-30,000 fee tier) [S34, S35] |
| TODS (tourist-oriented directional signs) | Within 15 miles of the state route; minimum 2,000 annual visitors, the museum clears this in month one of any scenario | Fees quoted by Missouri Logos (contractor); local-government consent where signs route through city streets [S34] |
| Freeway "traffic generator" supplemental signs | Requires 200,000 annual visitors (rural threshold) | Not attainable at this scale, exclude from planning [S34] |
| Billboards, I-49 / I-44 | Zoned/unzoned commercial-industrial only; 1,400-ft same-side spacing; permits $200 + $100 biennial | Joplin-market bulletins lease at ~$2,500–$4,500 per four weeks [S34] |
School/group sales + CRM ~30% of launch effort; geo-targeted digital/search/CTV ~25%; outdoor/highway/wayfinding ~15%; tourism, hotel, CVB and attraction partners ~10%; PR, launches and community events ~10%; retention, membership and email ~10%. Missouri's 50% Marketing Matching Grant reimbursements flow only through certified DMOs, a formal partnership with a Newton County DMO entity is the unlock [S37].
| Function | Museum-only planning | Planetarium increment |
|---|---|---|
| Executive / development | 1.5–2.0 FTE | 0–0.5 FTE if sponsorship/events expand |
| Curatorial / collections / registrar | 1.5–2.0 FTE | No substitution, the relocated collection raises, not lowers, this requirement |
| Education / group sales | 2.0–2.5 FTE | +0.5–1.0 FTE for shows and curriculum |
| Visitor services / retail | 2.5–3.0 FTE equivalent | +0.5 FTE throughput support |
| Facilities / security / IT | 1.5–2.0 FTE or contracts | +0.5–1.0 FTE technical coverage |
| Marketing / membership / admin | 1.5–2.0 FTE | +0.5 FTE program cadence |
| TOTAL | About 10 blended FTE | About +3 blended FTE |
Volunteer enthusiasm is an asset, the Bonne Terre museum was built on it, but it cannot replace professional accountability for collections, safety, education quality, finance or complex projection systems. Staff plans should include two-deep coverage for every safety-critical and revenue-critical role. The founding organization's principals are themselves a staffing asset: continuity roles for the existing team, formalized early, preserve institutional knowledge no hire can replace.
Accessibility must be planned at concept stage: step-free routes, seating variety, captioning, hearing assistance, tactile and large-print alternatives, color contrast, sensory maps, quiet space, family restrooms, service-animal policy, and planetarium alternatives for visitors affected by motion, darkness or intense sound. Accessibility is also a funding narrative: underwritten sensory nights and veteran programs are exactly the outcomes regional funders buy.
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Early warning | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relocation agreement stalls or terms disappoint | Medium | High | No executed agreement within 6 months; site negotiation drift | Dedicated counsel; term sheet with milestones; keep St. Charles-style rival bids visible to all parties |
| Attendance overreach | Medium | High | Weak school LOIs; low survey conversion | Stage staffing; preserve cash; use low case for commitments |
| Gross/net area misunderstanding | High | High | Program cannot fit after support spaces | Architectural program before fundraising claims |
| Hidden building conditions (historic downtown shell) | Medium | High | MEP, structure, floor-loading or environmental findings | Due diligence and ≥20% early contingency |
| Underfunded operations | High | High | Capital gifts restricted; no annual commitments | Three-year support plan and working-capital gate |
| Novelty decay | Medium | Medium | Year-2 decline; low member renewal | Rotating zone, calendar and CRM |
| Planetarium obsolescence | Medium | High | Unsupported system; rising maintenance | Lifecycle reserve, service terms, open content workflow |
| Competitive preemption (NWA Space & Science Center) | Low-Med | Medium | Rogers capital campaign accelerates | Open first with the real collection; regional partnership posture, not rivalry |
| Signage / tourism overcount | Medium | Medium | Permits delayed; no referral data | Excluded from base; track source and ZIP |
Authorize a 12–16 week validation and concept-definition phase. Advance the museum-only concept as the base project; preserve a planetarium-ready option. Execute and document the relocation agreement as the phase's first workstream. Do not authorize construction, debt, final equipment selection or public attendance promises until the gates below are cleared.
| Workstream | Deliverable | Passing evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Collection / relocation | Executed agreement; object/loan inventory; flagship shortlist; transport & insurance plan | Clear title/terms; feasible care and exhibition; NASA loan status documented |
| Market | 600-household 60/75/90-minute survey + price/planetarium test | Base demand consistent with 29k; low case survivable |
| Education | 25 teacher/admin interviews and group-sales pipeline | LOIs for ≥8,500 museum or ≥11,000 dome-case K-12 visits |
| Site / facility | Architectural program, downtown site test-fits and due diligence | 17k net exhibits protected; buses, parking, ADA, floor loads, MEP work |
| Capital | Three independent ROM estimates + campaign feasibility test | Scope within range; ≥70% of capital committed before build |
| Operations | Five-year staffing/cash/support plan | 12 months working capital; three-year annual support commitments |
| Planetarium | Vendor concepts, lifecycle and accessibility plan; portable-dome outreach pilot | Fully funded increment and funded refresh reserve |
| Governance | Entity, board skills, policies and authority matrix | Museum-qualified leadership and public-trust controls |
Indicative validation budget. Plan approximately $125,000–$225,000 for research, concept design, collection and relocation assessment, site due diligence, cost planning and campaign feasibility, consistent with current market rates for museum feasibility work ($40–70K), assessments (from $18K) and early concept design [S41]. That expenditure is meaningful but small against a poorly scoped $10–30 million capital project, and most of it is directly reusable in grant applications (IMLS, NASA, USDA) that reward documented planning.
Run the validation phase to conclude alongside the relocation agreement's execution. Announcing "the collection is secured, the plan is validated, the campaign begins" as one event, ideally inside the Route 66 centennial press window, is worth months of ordinary marketing.
| Assumption | Current treatment | Required confirmation |
|---|---|---|
| Location | Downtown Neosho, near the square | Exact building/site, control, cost and restrictions |
| Collection | Space Museum & Grissom Center relocation proceeds; ~$40M valuation treated as unappraised | Executed agreement; independent appraisal; inventory and loan terms |
| Hours | Six days / about 300 days annually | Staffing, holidays, maintenance and seasonal calendar |
| Prices | $8 adult; $6 student/college/senior/veteran | Willingness-to-pay and family-bundle test (Bonne Terre's current $15/$10 suggests headroom) |
| Exhibit area | 17,000 net sf midpoint | Net exhibit versus total gross building |
| Planetarium | 60–70 seats / ~10 m / +3,900 sf / $4.5–6.5M | Vendor and architect validation |
| Bonne Terre attendance | ~3,000 annual, sponsor-provided | Independent documentation if used publicly |
| Branson / Tulsa / Route 66 | Excluded from base | Measured partnerships and referral conversion |
| Capital | Class 4 ranges; no acquisition/major site surprises | Independent estimator and site due diligence |
Citations in square brackets refer to this register. Retrieved 6–7 August 2026 unless noted. Sponsor statements are treated as assumptions until independently documented.
| Section | Topic | What it answers |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Executive business conclusion | Can the board fund this institution? |
| 02 | Business model and decision frame | Who pays, for what, and why |
| 03 | Market and attendance assumptions | The demand the model rests on |
| 04 | Pricing and customer architecture | $8/$6 tested; the break-even question |
| 05 | Earned-revenue model | What operations can honestly earn |
| 06 | Operating cost and staffing | The true annual bill |
| 07 | Capital feasibility and scope sensitivity | What it costs to build, 2026 prices |
| 08 | Planetarium business case | The dome's honest arithmetic |
| 09 | Funding, fundraising and liquidity strategy | Subsidies vs donations; the capital stack |
| 10 | Marketing and sales plan | Budget, channels and 2026 costs |
| 11 | Scenario and sensitivity analysis | What survives the low case |
| 12 | Governance, controls and KPI dashboard | How the board stays in control |
| 13 | Implementation roadmap and gates | Phases, timing, go/no-go tests |
| 14 | Risk register and recommendation | The final word |
| 15 | Assumptions and source register | Every number's provenance |
This study rests on current, verified evidence: (1) the announced relocation of the Space Museum & Grissom Center collection (~$40M, unappraised), the capital campaign now has an anchor asset and a founding story; (2) a fully verified 2026 funding map: IMLS operating and taking FY26 applications, NASA's education office restored at $143M, USDA Community Facilities loans for which Neosho qualifies, and a permanently authorized New Markets Tax Credit; (3) current exhibit-fabrication benchmarks that raise the capital planning base to ~$16.8M museum-only; (4) verified MoDOT signage fees and 2025 traffic counts; (5) 2026 advertising channel costs; (6) pricing headroom evidence, the collection's current home charges $15 adult against Neosho's proposed $8; and (7) AAM's November 2025 sector survey, which hardens every funding gate in Section 9.
Read the executive conclusion first, then test the assumptions most likely to change the decision: school commitments, realized ticket yield, operating support commitments, capital scope and the planetarium gates. The companion Museum Feasibility Study carries market, program, collection and facility analysis; the two documents share one evidence base. A companion Excel driver model lets you change any assumption and watch the financials recalculate.
Conclusion. Both options can operate as nonprofit/public-benefit institutions; neither is commercially self-sustaining at the proposed admission prices. The business question is therefore not "will ticket sales pay for the museum?" It is: can the board reliably assemble earned revenue, annual public/private support, reserves and disciplined cost control at the required scale? Two questions the group will ask are answered up front: there is no break-even admission price inside realistic regional willingness to pay (Section 4.3), and no standing government subsidy pays museum operating costs; the gap is closed by a designed mix of local public mechanisms and private giving (Sections 4.4 and 9). The relocating collection improves the answer; it anchors the campaign, shortens the credibility argument with funders, and brings a proven founding team, but it does not change the arithmetic below.
| Metric | Museum only | Museum + planetarium | Increment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilized attendance | 29,000 | 41,000 | +12,000 |
| Earned revenue | $376,200 | $681,330 | +$305,130 |
| Operating expense | $1,020,000 | $1,420,000 | +$400,000 |
| Required annual support | $643,800 | $738,670 | +$94,870 |
| Earned-revenue coverage | 36.9% | 48.0% | +11.1 points |
| Planning capital range (2026 basis) | $10.0–$24.0M | $14.5–$30.5M | +$4.5–$6.5M |
Proceed only if the institution can secure capital without burdening operations, hold at least 12 months of opening liquidity, and document three years of annual operating support. Treat the planetarium as a fully funded strategic enhancement, not as the mechanism that makes the museum profitable.
The appropriate model is a mission-driven attraction with five reinforcing earned-revenue engines, admissions, planetarium add-on, programs/camps, memberships, and rentals/retail, paired with annual giving, sponsorship, grants, public support and, once liquidity is solved, an endowment or board-designated reserve.
| Customer / funder | Primary value | Revenue mechanism | Sales motion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schools | Standards-aligned field trip and lab | $6 museum; $4 dome group add-on | Direct district/teacher sales and annual rebooking |
| Families / residents | Accessible regional experience | $8 adult / $6 youth; bundles/membership | Geo-targeted acquisition + CRM retention |
| Colleges | Research, events, data and workforce | $6 tickets, contracts, co-produced programs | Faculty and administration partnerships; Crowder MOU |
| Tourists | Distinctive two-hour itinerary stop | General admission, bundle, retail | Hotel/CVB/operator packages; Route 66 centennial itineraries |
| Corporations | Workforce, community and hospitality | Sponsorship, rentals, employee access | Named-account development (Jack Henry, La-Z-Boy-class employers) |
| Donors / public partners | Education, preservation and regional identity | Annual gifts, grants, appropriations, endowment | Campaign and stewardship anchored by the Grissom collection |
ASTC respondents average roughly half of revenue from earned sources (51% in the 2024 survey), with the rest from public and private support; admission is a minority of earned revenue even there. The proposed Neosho price is well below the U.S. respondent median of $14–15, so a lower earned share in early years should be expected, and the AAM's 2025 finding that a third of museums lost government grants means the support half of the model must be diversified from day one [S5, S6, S7].
The 21-county catchment counts 1,527,138 people (Vintage 2025); the primary K-12 base is ~208,400 public-school students plus ~30,300 private and an estimated 15,000–17,500 homeschooled. The model excludes Tulsa County and does not rely on Branson, Route 66 or highway-sign conversion in the base [S1–S4]. Full market analysis, comparables and triangulation live in the companion study; the numbers the financial model consumes are:
| Option | Low | Base | High | Base capture of 21-co. pop. | Board use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Museum only | 17,800 | 29,000 | 44,000 | 1.9% | Budget to base; survive low |
| Museum + planetarium | 27,000 | 41,000 | 59,000 | 2.7% | Do not borrow against high |
The school case is the most controllable. Base museum attendance assumes 8,500 K-12 visits, 4.1% of the catchment's public-school students (5.3% in the dome case at 11,000). Those rates are attainable only with active group sales, curriculum quality, reliable bus logistics and annual rebooking, and they should be pre-sold through letters of intent before fixed costs are committed.
The proposed $8 adult and $6 student/college/senior/veteran prices are accessible and materially below regional and sector benchmarks. That supports inclusion and group conversion, but limits cost recovery. The model assumes a blended realized museum yield of $6.30 after mix, discounts, comps and memberships.
| Institution | Adult | Student / child | Signal for Neosho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed Neosho Space Museum | $8.00 | $6.00 | Lowest paid admission in the competitive set |
| Space Museum & Grissom Center (current home of the collection) | $15.00 | $10.00 | The same collection already commands nearly 2× the proposed price [S8] |
| Tulsa Air & Space Museum | $11.00 ($20 combo) | $8.00 | Museum/planetarium priced separately [S9] |
| Discovery Center of Springfield | $17.00 | $12.00 | Regional families already pay 2× proposed [S10] |
| Amazeum, Bentonville | $17.00 | $17.00 | NWA market bears premium family pricing [S11] |
| Stafford Air & Space, Weatherford OK | $14.00 | $8.00 | Small-town space museum at $14 [S12] |
| Cosmosphere, Hutchinson KS | $18.25 ($32.50 pass) | $15.00 | Dome and planetarium as add-ons [S13] |
| ASTC U.S. median (2024) | $14–15 | n/a | Sector median is nearly double proposed [S5] |
| Product | Recommended posted price | Modelled realized yield | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Museum adult | $8 | In $6.30 blended | Sponsor price; accessible launch position |
| Museum student / college | $6 | In $6.30 blended | Matches sponsor and regional group logic |
| Museum senior / veteran | $6 | In $6.30 blended | $2 discount from adult |
| Planetarium adult add-on | $5 | $4.40 blended | Separate value and lifecycle funding |
| Planetarium group add-on | $4 | $4.40 blended | Protects $6 museum price and school affordability |
| Suggested bundle | $12 adult / $10 student | Test before launch | Clear savings versus separate tickets |
| Family membership | $85–$120 | In membership revenue | Repeat and CRM strategy; test benefits |
Every verified comparable, including the collection's own current home, charges more than the proposed prices. Launching at $8 is a legitimate accessibility strategy, but it should be a choice, not a ceiling. Recommended: price-test $10–12 adult in the validation survey; protect school access at $6 through sponsor underwriting rather than blanket underpricing; measure yield by segment (posted price, discount, comp, membership allocation, group price, dome add-on, net cash) from day one; and treat the family unit, two adults, two children, as the real unit of choice. Each $1 of realized adult yield is worth roughly $12,000–$18,000 a year at base attendance.
Responding to this study's initial finding that $8/$6 pricing sits at the low end of the regional market, the sponsor has proposed a revised structure and circulated it to the project group, including the collection's founding principals, for input. It replaces the flat $5 planetarium add-on with true two-attraction ticketing.
| Tier | Space Museum | Planetarium | Combo (both) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | $14 | $12 | $22 |
| Student (K-12 and college/university with valid ID) | $8 | $10 | $16 |
| Senior / military | Open item | Open item | $20 ($2 off adult combo) |
Holding the Section 4 admission mix constant, the blended museum yield rises from $6.30 to roughly $10.50 per visit before promotions. If attendance held at the 29,000 base, museum-only earned revenue would rise about $120,000 and the annual support gap would fall toward $520,000; if the higher prices cost ten percent of attendance, the gap still improves to roughly $570,000. In the combined program, the combo replaces a $4.40 realized add-on with an $8.00 increment across every tier, lifting base dome revenue from about $126,000 toward $200,000 at the same 70% uptake. The proposal also creates the promotional headroom the sponsor intends: posted prices this high can fund free days, library passes and seasonal discounts without eroding the rack rate.
The cautions are the mirror image. A $14 adult ticket moves Neosho from the cheapest position in the four-state set to the middle-upper band (Stafford $14, Discovery Center and Amazeum $17, Cosmosphere $18.25), so the validation survey must now bracket $12 / $14 / $16 rather than $8-12, and the demand-response assumption stops being theoretical. The $8 student rate, up from $6, directly affects the 8,500-visit school pipeline this plan depends on; the group should consider holding pre-booked school groups at $6-7 through sponsor underwriting even if the walk-up student price is $8. Elasticity, not arithmetic, is now the open question, and it is testable.
Senior/military prices for single attractions; whether a student or senior planetarium-only ticket exists at the door or only as a combo; group/school rate and chaperone policy; the combo-uptake assumption (this study uses 70%); a promotions allowance (suggested 5-8% of gross admissions); membership prices rebased against the new gate prices (family membership should roughly equal three combo visits); and the demand-response assumption to apply until the survey reports. The companion Feasibility Explorer website and driver workbook accept every one of these as a live input.
Until the group confirms the structure, this study's base case remains $8/$6 so that every published number stays reproducible. The revised proposal is carried as the leading scenario in the Feasibility Explorer, and the studies will be rebased in full once pricing is settled.
Short answer: no realistic one exists, and the arithmetic is worth seeing plainly because it settles a question every board member will ask.
| Break-even test | Museum only | Museum + planetarium |
|---|---|---|
| Operating expense | $1,020,000 | $1,420,000 |
| Earned revenue excluding admissions | $193,500 | $423,030 |
| Amount admissions must cover | $826,500 | $996,970 |
| Base attendance | 29,000 | 41,000 |
| Required realized yield per visit | $28.50 | $24.32 |
| Implied posted adult price (realized ≈ 79% of posted) | ~$36 | ~$31 |
A $31–36 posted adult ticket is roughly double the region's most expensive science attraction (Cosmosphere, $18.25) and four times the proposed $8; attendance would not hold while the price quadrupled, so the break-even price recedes as the crowd it depends on walks away. The failure repeats from the other direction: at proposed prices each visit contributes about $7.80 against roughly $870,000 of cost not covered by programs, memberships and rentals, so break-even attendance is about 112,000 visits a year, nearly four times the base case and beyond any plausible capture of this region.
| Pricing posture | Posted adult | Annual support still required | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed (sponsor) | $8 | $643,800 | Maximum access; maximum subsidy |
| Regional mid-market | $12 | ~$552,000 | Still below Discovery Center and Amazeum; trims the gap ~14% |
| ASTC U.S. median | $14–15 | ~$484,000–$507,000 | Sector-normal pricing; gap narrows ~21–25% but remains structural |
| Theoretical break-even | ~$36 | $0 | Not survivable; demand collapses first |
Pricing can narrow the gap; it cannot close it. Each added dollar of realized yield is worth roughly $12,000–18,000 a year, which is why the $10–12 price test matters. But the economics here are those of a library or a school, not a cinema, and that is the definition of a nonprofit institution: the support gap is a designed, permanent revenue line, not a temporary problem.
Both, by design; donations are structurally required. There is no standing federal or Missouri program that pays museum operating bills year after year; grants are episodic and program-restricted, and the durable public options are local. A realistic composition of the museum-only gap:
| Gap-funding layer | Realistic annual range | Reality check |
|---|---|---|
| Local public mechanisms: hotel-motel tax allocation, CID sales tax, city/county appropriation | $150K–$300K | The only recurring government money available; requires local action, and a CID has already been floated publicly [S28] |
| Federal and state program grants (IMLS, NASA, MAC, MHC) | $25K–$150K | Episodic; $0 in bad years; program-restricted and volatile [S22–S24] |
| Corporate sponsorship and underwriting | $100K–$175K | Bus funds, naming, program sponsorship; Jack Henry and La-Z-Boy-class anchors [S28] |
| Annual giving, events and individual donors | $150K–$275K | Must exist in every scenario; anchored by the collection story |
| Endowment draw (later years) | $0 → $100K+ | Only after capital and liquidity are solved; full-gap endowment needs ~$14.3M |
| Total to assemble | $643,800 | $738,670 with the planetarium |
Read as a portfolio: government can carry roughly a quarter to half of the gap, and only if local mechanisms are enacted; grants are upside, never budgeted as certain; philanthropy and sponsorship must reliably cover the remaining $250,000–$450,000 a year. No single subsidy fills the gap; a designed stack does.
| Earned source | Museum base | Planetarium base | Calculation / assumption |
|---|---|---|---|
| Museum admissions | $182,700 | $258,300 | Visits × $6.30 realized yield |
| Planetarium add-on | $0 | $126,280 | 41,000 × 70% attachment × $4.40 |
| Retail net contribution | $43,500 | $71,750 | $1.50 / $1.75 per visit after cost of goods |
| Programs and camps | $60,000 | $90,000 | Net annual revenue; staffing included in opex |
| Memberships | $65,000 | $85,000 | Requires launch conversion and renewal |
| Rentals and special events | $25,000 | $50,000 | Net contribution, not gross billings |
| TOTAL EARNED | $376,200 | $681,330 | 36.9% / 48.0% of annual operating cost |
Sponsorship and unrestricted grants are excluded from earned revenue and counted toward required annual support. This avoids describing philanthropic revenue as customer demand and keeps the operating gap visible.
| Expense line | Museum base | Planetarium base | Planning logic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personnel + payroll burden | $520,000 | $700,000 | About 10 vs 13 blended FTE plus part-time coverage |
| Occupancy / utilities / janitorial | $140,000 | $190,000 | Larger volume, HVAC and dome hours |
| Insurance / security / safety | $50,000 | $60,000 | High-value collection, public operation and events |
| Exhibits / collections care | $75,000 | $75,000 | Rotation, conservation, mounts and supplies |
| Marketing / sales | $80,000 | $110,000 | School sales, launch, tourism and retention |
| IT / ticketing / systems | $35,000 | $40,000 | CRM, POS, network and licenses |
| Program / retail direct cost | $35,000 | $55,000 | Supplies and cost of goods |
| Administration / professional | $45,000 | $55,000 | Audit, legal, HR and development |
| General operating reserve | $40,000 | $60,000 | Annual renewal and volatility |
| Dome content / maintenance / refresh reserve | $0 | $75,000 | Show licensing ($5–15K), service, and ~$35–50K/yr toward the 10–15-year system refresh [S14, S15] |
| TOTAL | $1,020,000 | $1,420,000 | Class 4 operating allowance |
Tulsa Air & Space, 19,000 exhibit square feet with a 110-seat planetarium, the closest structural analogue, runs on roughly $1.0–1.3M a year, and its 2023 near-closure showed what happens when that budget is not underwritten. Discovery Center of Springfield operates 60,000 sf on ~$2.6M. A $1.0–1.4M Neosho budget is neither lean nor lavish; it is the regional going rate for a professional institution of this scale [S16].
The budget should be recast after site due diligence, insurance quotes, benefit decisions, content licenses and staffing schedules. Until then, the central test is not whether each line is exact; it is whether the board can support a roughly $1.0–$1.4 million annual institution before debt service, permanently. Salary benchmarks should anticipate competition: national average planetarium-director compensation exceeds $90K, and two-deep coverage is required for every safety-critical and revenue-critical role [S15].
| Museum-only base build-up | Amount | Basis (2026 benchmarks) |
|---|---|---|
| Building renovation | $4.93M | 24,650 gross sf × $200/sf, assumes a sound donated/low-cost shell; museum-grade construction runs $500–1,200/sf if the shell disappoints [S17] |
| Exhibit design / fabrication | $5.95M | 17,000 net sf × $350/sf; current fabricator benchmarks: $200–350 interpretive, $350–550 hands-on, $500–1,000+ high-interactive science [S18] |
| Collection relocation, FF&E and core IT | $0.60M | Artifact-grade transport, mounts, cases and systems for the Bonne Terre collection |
| Soft costs | $1.72M | 15% of hard costs (design 12–25% of exhibit budget is the sector norm) [S18] |
| Contingency | $2.64M | 20% of hard + soft (sector guidance; add ~4%/yr escalation to opening) [S18] |
| Pre-opening / working capital | $1.00M | Hiring, training, launch and liquidity |
| MODELED BASE | $16.84M | Within the $10–24M planning range |
Scope sensitivities. Two swings dominate. (1) Gross vs net: if "16,000–18,000 square feet" means total gross building, the museum must be redesigned around roughly 10,000–12,000 net exhibit square feet and a $7–12M range may be possible, a different institution with a different forecast. (2) Exhibit intensity: at fabricators' current $500/sf for highly interactive science exhibits, the exhibit line alone rises $2.5M; the artifact-rich relocated collection is the natural hedge, because object-led galleries cost less per foot than interactive-dense ones [S18]. The planetarium increment of $4.5–6.5M is anchored to the University of Alaska Fairbanks' as-built 2026 addition, $5.6M construction for a 65-seat, 11 m dome, ~$8M all-in with systems and endowed staffing [S14].
| Business advantage | Business disadvantage |
|---|---|
| Adds roughly 12,000 base annual visits and the region's only museum-grade dome, nearest competitors 95+ miles away | Adds roughly $400,000 annual operating cost |
| Creates a $4–5 paid add-on and bundles | Base add-on revenue is only about $126,000 |
| Strengthens memberships, rentals, sponsors and evening programs | Requires specialist staffing and two-deep technical coverage |
| Low-cost content changes relative to exhibit rebuilds; perpetual show licenses ~$7K at this seat tier [S15] | Content licenses, support and hardware replacement recur; refresh every 10–15 years at $250–500K [S14] |
| School scheduling and bus-group throughput anchor | Showtimes create queues and unused off-peak capacity |
| Potential naming gift and visible campaign asset, Love's paid $3.5M for OKC dome naming [S19] | Donors may fund equipment but not lifetime operations |
Base capacity. At 70 seats, five shows per day and 300 days, annual seat capacity is 105,000. Base demand of 28,700 dome users equals 27% average load and ~19 people per show. That is operationally comfortable, and it demonstrates why the dome should be sized for a bus group, not for peak-event fantasies.
Simple incremental break-even. Ignoring attendance-induced retail and memberships, covering a $400,000 operating increment entirely through a $4.40 realized dome yield would require about 90,900 paid dome uses, nearly full use of the 105,000-seat annual capacity. Even after including the wider $305,000 earned-revenue increment, the dome still adds about $95,000 to annual support needs. It should never be sold to the board as self-financing.
The planetarium adds about $126,000 in base add-on revenue and contributes to higher attendance, retail, programs, memberships and rentals. The total earned-revenue increment is about $305,000, below the modeled $400,000 operating-cost increment. Its case rests on mission reach, differentiation, uniqueness within 60 miles, and fundraising, not stand-alone profit. A ~$30–50K portable dome run as paid school outreach from year one (peers gross $350–500 per school day) is the cheap way to build the dome's booking network, and its demand evidence, before pouring concrete [S15].
Capital gifts and operating gifts are different products. The campaign must explicitly fund opening liquidity, first exhibitions, pre-opening staff, technology reserves and early operating support, not only bricks and equipment. At a 4.5% spending rate, permanently covering the full $643,800 museum-only gap would imply a ~$14.3M endowment ($16.4M for the dome case), which is why the practical model mixes annual giving, sponsors, public support and endowment income rather than relying on one source.
| Funding layer | Recommended rule | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Capital commitments | ≥70% committed before construction; all sources identified before opening | Avoids an unfinished or value-engineered institution |
| Working capital | At least 12 months of operating cash need | Protects ramp-up and attendance volatility |
| Three-year support | Written unrestricted/public commitments | Covers the known support gap during stabilization |
| Technology reserve | Annual restricted/designated contribution | Dome, AV, interactives, ticketing and network refresh |
| Exhibit renewal reserve | Annual budgeted contribution | Rotating zone and current-mission content |
| Endowment / quasi-endowment | Use only after liquidity and capital are solved | Long-term support; board-approved draw policy |
| Source | 2026 status & fit | Realistic role |
|---|---|---|
| USDA Rural Development, Community Facilities | Neosho (pop. ~14,100) qualifies under the ≤20,000 threshold; museums explicitly eligible; direct loans to 40 years at 4.50–4.75% (2026 rates); grant share likely 15–35% band [S20] | The realistic large-dollar debt tool, but only against committed support, never against high-case attendance |
| New Markets Tax Credit | Made permanent in 2025; record $10B allocation round; nonprofit community facilities qualify, Neosho census-tract eligibility must be verified [S21] | 7–15% of capital via investor equity if the tract qualifies |
| IMLS | Survived 2025 dismantling attempt; FY26 funded at $291.8M and taking applications (Museums for America $5K–350K, 1:1 match; Inspire! for Small Museums); politically volatile, plan, don't bank [S22] | Program and exhibit grants post-opening (needs 120 public days/yr + professional staff) |
| NASA STEM Engagement | FY26 conference restored full $143M (Next Gen STEM $13.5M); TEAM II tiers ($400K–900K) exist but no current solicitation, monitor EONS forecasts; Community Anchor designation is the realistic first rung [S23] | Education program funding; credibility signal for the campaign |
| NEH / Missouri Humanities · Missouri Arts Council | FY26 appropriated but NEH under-disbursing; MHC mini/major grants $5K/$15K; MAC annual grants to $40K (requires 1 year of operating history) [S24] | Spacetown oral-history and interpretive content funding |
| Missouri tourism co-op (MMG) | 50% marketing reimbursement, certified DMOs only; partner through a Newton County DMO entity; state tourism budget under pressure [S25] | Halves the out-of-state marketing bill |
| State earmarks | Tightening sharply: FY27 carried $304M in earmarks amid vetoes and a shrinking surplus [S26] | Pursue with legislator champion; assign low probability |
| Regional foundations | Sunderland (KC, construction-focused; $5M lead gift to Springfield Art Museum; Cosmosphere donor); Helen S. Boylan (Carthage; funds capital, quarterly deadlines); Community Foundation of the Ozarks (2026-27 rounds open); Windgate. Walton Family Foundation's Home Region 2030 excludes SW Missouri, do not count it [S27] | Anchor + mid-tier capital gifts; Sunderland is the priority cultivation |
| Corporate + local | Jack Henry (Monett, 35 mi), La-Z-Boy Midwest (Neosho's major employer), regional banks/utilities; city hotel-motel tax fund; CID/TIF/TDD/NID statutory tools; downtown historic district enables historic tax credits [S28] | Sponsorships, bus-fund underwriting, naming inventory; a CID was already floated publicly for this project |
| Congressionally directed spending | The Cosmosphere's current renovation stacks a Senate earmark + state grant + Sunderland, the proven space-museum pattern [S29] | Worth a delegation ask once validation is done |
A $16.8M museum-only base could realistically stack: $3–5M regional foundations and corporate; $2–4M individual/family campaign anchored by the collection story; $2–5M USDA CF loan sized to committed support; $1–2.5M NMTC equity (if tract-eligible); $0.5–1.5M local mechanisms (hotel-motel, CID, historic credits); $0.5–1M federal/state program grants across the build. Every layer has a 2026-verified pathway, and none of it assembles itself without the validation-phase documents. Comparable proof: Springfield Art Museum ($30M city + foundations), Amazeum ($25M campaign launched 2025), Cosmosphere (federal + state + foundation stack) [S27, S29, S30].
The business plan should fund a two-year launch rather than a ribbon-cutting burst. The steady-state allowance in the operating budget is $80,000 museum-only or $110,000 with a planetarium, deliberately above both the sector's actual behavior (museums spend 2–3% of operating budgets on marketing, which here would be only $20–31K) and the IMPACTS finding that organizations reaching their market potential invest 10–15% of earned revenue in audience acquisition ($38–56K at base), because a new museum must buy awareness it does not yet have. The opening year adds a further $10–20K overlay funded from pre-opening capital, roughly $90K/$130K in total that first year, heaviest in the six months before opening [S31].
| Workstream | Budget share | Primary KPI | 90-day action |
|---|---|---|---|
| School / group sales | 30% | Booked students; rebooking | Build educator CRM; teacher preview; district calls |
| Digital acquisition | 25% | Cost per paid visit | Geo/search campaigns with ticket attribution |
| Outdoor / wayfinding | 15% | Recall and source-coded visits | MoDOT logo/TODS applications; billboard tests; arrival audit |
| Tourism partnerships | 10% | Partner-referred visits | Hotel/CVB/operator packages and referral codes; Route 66 centennial itineraries |
| PR / launch / events | 10% | Earned reach and conversion | Collection-arrival stories; Grissom anniversary calendar; Fall Festival pop-up |
| Retention / membership | 10% | Repeat, renewal, email conversion | Membership presale and automated journeys |
| Channel | 2026 cost benchmark | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Paid search (Google) | Travel CPC $2.14 · Arts CPC $1.63 | Capture active trip-planning demand; ~$27–45 per lead sector-wide [S32] |
| Meta (Facebook/Instagram) | CPM $11.54 · Arts CPC $0.82 | Family reach in Joplin–NWA–Springfield geo-fence [S32] |
| Connected TV | $20–40 CPM | Launch-window awareness in the three metro corridors [S32] |
| Joplin-market bulletins (I-44/I-49) | $2,500–4,500 / 4 weeks | Two to three boards, launch year only; measure recall [S33] |
| MoDOT logo signs (I-49 at US-60) | $1,000/yr per direction | Permanent wayfinding, cheapest durable medium the museum will ever buy [S34] |
| TODS directional signs | Quoted by Missouri Logos | Museum clears the 2,000-visitor eligibility floor immediately [S34] |
Event-weekend data shows Neosho can attract large citywide crowds, the Fall Festival brings ~18,000 to the square, but device counts are not museum admissions. Use festivals for pop-up programming, timed offers and attribution tests rather than embedding a fixed conversion in the forecast [S35]. The Branson opportunity is worked the same way: packages, referral codes, and measured conversion from a 10M-visitor market that draws two-thirds of its guests from within 300 miles, never an assumed percentage [S36].
| Scenario | Attendance | Earned revenue | Operating expense | Annual support | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Museum low | 17,800 | $230,900 | $940,000 | $709,100 | Survival case; scale variable labor/programs |
| Museum base | 29,000 | $376,200 | $1,020,000 | $643,800 | Planning case |
| Museum high | 44,000 | $570,800 | $1,140,000 | $569,200 | Do not borrow against it |
| Planetarium low | 27,000 | $448,700 | $1,320,000 | $871,300 | Weakest subsidy result, fixed dome costs |
| Planetarium base | 41,000 | $681,330 | $1,420,000 | $738,670 | Planning case |
| Planetarium high | 59,000 | $980,500 | $1,580,000 | $599,500 | Requires strong school and family conversion |
The key sensitivity is not ticket price alone. Attendance mix, realized yield, school-group volume, staffing scale, utilities, annual giving and the technology reserve all matter. The planetarium low case is particularly revealing: adding fixed complexity before demand matures can push the annual support requirement to over $871,000. Conversely, each $1 of posted adult price (Section 4's headroom finding) is worth up to ~$23K a year on the model's blended-yield basis, roughly $12–18K if student and senior tiers stay fixed. It is the cheapest sensitivity in the model to move.
Before construction, the board should approve a response plan for the low case: hiring stages, days/hours, program calendar, rotating-exhibit spend, marketing floor, cash-reserve trigger and fundraising escalation. Do not make the low case survivable by cutting collections care, safety, preventive maintenance or essential accessibility.
| KPI | Board cadence | Decision use |
|---|---|---|
| Visits by segment / ZIP / source | Monthly | Demand, geography and channel quality |
| Paid yield and comp rate | Monthly | Pricing integrity and access-program control |
| School pipeline and rebooking | Monthly in season | Base attendance predictability |
| Earned revenue / operating cost | Monthly | Coverage and corrective action |
| Unrestricted cash days | Monthly | Liquidity and risk trigger |
| Annual support committed / needed | Monthly | Fundraising exposure |
| Membership renewal / repeat visits | Quarterly | Novelty decay and retention |
| Dome load, yield and downtime | Weekly/monthly | Schedule, maintenance and product economics |
| Capital commitments / forecast at completion | Monthly during build | Scope and contingency control |
| Safety, collections and accessibility incidents | Immediate + quarterly | Public trust and operational quality |
Governance should separate campaign success from operational readiness. The board needs finance, museum, education, development, legal, facilities/construction, marketing, technology and community representation, plus continuity seats for the founding organization. Management should have explicit authority limits for contracts, discounts, acquisitions, loans, capital changes and restricted funds.
| Phase | Indicative timing | Work | Gate to advance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0. Validation | 12–16 weeks | Relocation agreement executed; survey; school LOIs; collection audit; site test-fit; ROM costs; campaign test | Evidence supports base; low case survivable; agreement signed |
| 1. Concept + governance | 3–5 months | Entity, mission, board, policies, concept design, operating plan | Approved program and funding strategy |
| 2. Campaign + schematic | 6–12 months | Lead gifts, USDA/NMTC/public sources, design, exhibit concept, approvals | ≥70% capital committed |
| 3. Design + procurement | 8–12 months | Construction documents, bid, exhibit/AV procurement | Forecast within funding + contingency |
| 4. Build + pre-open | 12–18 months | Construction, fabrication, collection transport, hiring, training, sales, testing | All sources identified; 12 months liquidity |
| 5. Stabilize | 24 months | Measure, tune price/hours/staff/programs | Year-2 base economics and quality targets |
If the planetarium cannot clear its gates in Phase 2, preserve the prepared location and utilities, open the museum-only concept, run the portable-dome outreach program to build the school network, collect real audience data for 18–24 months, and then make a Phase 2 dome decision with better evidence. The relocation timeline announced in May 2026, one to two years, aligns naturally with Phases 0–2; the collection should move once, into a conditioned, secure building, not twice.
| Business risk | Exposure | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Capital campaign funds a building, not operations | High | Three-year unrestricted commitments and opening liquidity gate |
| Relocation terms shift costs to the new entity (transport, conservation, insurance) | Medium-High | Term sheet with cost allocation before campaign launch; dedicated counsel |
| Admission price too low for yield | Medium | Price/conjoint test; bundles; underwriting instead of blanket discounts, headroom to $10–12 is evidenced |
| School demand slower than hiring | High | Signed pipeline; stage staff and calendar |
| Dome fixed cost arrives before demand | High | Phase/gate structure; lease/service options; fully funded reserve; portable-dome bridge |
| Site surprises consume exhibit/renewal funds | High | Due diligence; independent estimate; ≥20% contingency |
| Donor concentration | Medium | Gift policy, diversified public/private base and board accountability |
| Federal grant volatility (IMLS/NEH/NASA) | Medium | Treat as upside, never as budgeted revenue; diversify per Section 9 |
| Novelty decline | Medium | Rotating zone, program cadence, CRM and renewal metrics |
| Optimistic signage/tourism assumptions | Medium | Excluded from base; track attribution |
The business is conditionally feasible as a subsidized nonprofit/public-benefit museum, and the strongest version of this project is now on the table: the authentic collection secured, the campaign anchored by it, the museum-only concept validated first, and a planetarium-ready design carried until its gates are met. Advance museum-only validation now, execute the relocation agreement as workstream one, and authorize the dome only when capital, lifecycle reserve, three-year operating support, school commitments and additive space are secured. Under no scenario should high-case attendance or unapproved highway/tourist lift support debt.
Buy the validation phase, sign the collection, fund the gap on paper before funding the building in brick, and let the dome earn its way in.
| Model input | Museum only | Museum + planetarium |
|---|---|---|
| Stabilized annual attendance | 29,000 base (17,800–44,000) | 41,000 base (27,000–59,000) |
| Realized museum yield | $6.30 | $6.30 |
| Dome attachment / yield | N/A | 70% / $4.40 |
| Retail net contribution | $1.50 / visit | $1.75 / visit |
| Operating expense | $1.02M | $1.42M |
| Operating days | 300 (six-day schedule) | 300 |
| Capital range (2026 basis) | $10–24M · base $16.8M | $14.5–30.5M · base $22.4M |
| Capital exclusions | Acquisition, major site/structural/environmental work, financing costs | |
| Collection | Relocation proceeds on announced terms; ~$40M valuation treated as unappraised; transport/insurance in capital base | |
| Tourism / signage lift | Excluded from base, measured as upside via attribution | |
| Tax / debt structure | No operating debt recommended; USDA CF debt only against committed support | |
Citations in square brackets refer to this register. Retrieved 6–7 August 2026 unless noted. Sponsor statements are treated as assumptions until independently documented.
Built by LLM Squared (August 2026) as the live companion to the Neosho Space Museum feasibility package. The Calculator tab reproduces the studies' financial model exactly: load the study baseline preset and you will see the published numbers ($376,200 earned, $643,800 gap museum-only). The revised-proposal preset carries the pricing structure circulated to the group on 8 August 2026 for input from Rachel, Earl and the committee.
The full package also includes the Excel driver model and multi-year cash model, the funder calendar, the presentation deck, and validation-phase templates (school letter of intent, household survey, relocation checklist, funder one-pager, community briefing). Every number on this site traces to the studies' source registers.
Decision intelligence · evidence-backed planning ranges · not a construction bid or financing commitment. Nothing entered on this page is stored or transmitted.